Mail Archives: cygwin/2006/03/02/11:53:01
On Mar 2 04:56, Eric Blake wrote:
> I noticed the following strange behavior in chroot:
>
> $ chroot /bin /sleep 60 &
> [1] 16220539
> $ readlink /proc/${!}/root # simple test of whether chroot worked
> /bin
> $ chroot //EBLAKE/share /cygwin/bin/sleep 60 &
> [2] 566487
> $ readlink /proc/${!}/root # Good - chrooted to a share
> //EBLAKE/share
> $ chroot // //EBLAKE/share/cygwin/bin/sleep 60 &
> [3] 529435
> $ readlink /proc/${!}/root # Oops - should be //, not /
> /
> $ chroot //EBLAKE/share/cygwin/bin/sleep 60 & # Oops, failed to chroot
> [4] 566487
> $ chroot: cannot chdir to root directory: No such file or directory
>
> Why is chroot failing to find //EBLAKE, when it worked with // (at
> least, it slept correctly, although root linked to the wrong place),
> and did just fine with //EBLAKE/share?
I debugged this and I found the problem. However, there's no easy
workaround. The basic problem is that you try to chmod to a path
which either doesn't exist, or is not a valid Win32 path, for
instance //server/share is a valid path, but //server or // are not.
Same goes for paths like /proc or the cygdrive directory. The best
solution, at least for now, is to refuse to chroot to such a path.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -