X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
From:	"Dave Korn" <dave DOT korn AT artimi DOT com>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: 'Missing isnand' still not fixed in 2006-03-01 snapshot
Date:	Thu, 2 Mar 2006 15:36:04 -0000
Message-ID:	<037c01c63e0f$0489a940$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20060302153150.GA29658@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 02 March 2006 15:32, Christopher Faylor wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 03:24:59PM -0000, Dave Korn wrote:
>> On 02 March 2006 15:14, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> 
>>> On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 02:49:52PM -0000, Dave Korn wrote:
>>>> On 02 March 2006 14:34, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>>>> Well, I did this:
>>>>>   $ nm libcygwin.a | grep isnan
>>>>>   00000000 T ___isnand
>>>>>   00000000 I __imp____isnand
>>>>>   00000000 T ___isnanf
>>>>>   00000000 I __imp____isnanf
>>>>>   00000000 I __imp___isnan
>>>>>   00000000 T __isnan
>>>>>   00000000 I __imp___isnanf
>>>>>   00000000 T __isnanf
>>>>>   00000000 I __imp__isnan
>>>>>   00000000 T _isnan
>>>>>   00000000 I __imp__isnanf
>>>>>   00000000 T _isnanf
>>>>>   $ nm libm.a | grep isnan
>>>>>   00000000 T ___isnand

   >KOFF<          >KOFF<   ;-)  

>>>>>   00000000 I __imp____isnand
>>>>>   00000000 T ___isnanf
>>>>>   00000000 I __imp____isnanf
>>>>>   00000000 I __imp__isnan
>>>>>   00000000 T _isnan
>>>>>   00000000 I __imp__isnanf
>>>>>   00000000 T _isnanf
>>>>> 
>>>>> I don't see what would be wrong here.
>>>> 
>>>>  It's not in libc.a, does that make a difference?
>>> 
>>> It's in libm.a.
>> 
>> That's orthogonal to the question I asked!
> 
> Huh?  I was providing some information which was missing from any other
> message I saw in this thread.

  Actually it's right there in the output from nm, about ten lines above where
you mentioned it........ 

> Since all math functions are supposed to be in libm.a, then it really
> shouldn't be in libc.a and anything which relied on it being in libc.a
> would be in error.

 
>> BTW, I keep getting this "Error: Version info is older than DLL API!"

>> it.  Is anyone else getting this?  Could it be significant?
> 
> No.
> 
> cgf

  Thanks for clarifying those points :)


    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -