X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
From:	"Dave Korn" <dave DOT korn AT artimi DOT com>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: libm.info missing from snapshot?
Date:	Thu, 2 Mar 2006 15:33:31 -0000
Message-ID:	<037a01c63e0e$a9665cc0$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20060302073044.fb30e530d17747c2b054d625b8945d88.0137c92613.wbe@email.email.secureserver.net>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 02 March 2006 14:31, Jerry D. Hedden wrote:

>> While diff'ing snapshots, I noted that libm.info is in the 2006-02-24
>> snapshot, but is not in the 2006-03-01 snapshot.  Is this an oversight?
>>  (Is there some chance that this relates to the missing isnand problem?)
> 
> To clarify the parenthetically question, I know that libm.info is docs;
> not
> code.  But does this indicate some sort of change/error in the build
> process?

  A minor one in the newlib docs build:

http://sourceware.org/ml/newlib/2006/msg00135.html

    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -