Mail Archives: cygwin/2006/03/02/10:25:18
On 02 March 2006 15:14, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 02:49:52PM -0000, Dave Korn wrote:
>> On 02 March 2006 14:34, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>> Well, I did this:
>>> $ nm libcygwin.a | grep isnan
>>> 00000000 T ___isnand
>>> 00000000 I __imp____isnand
>>> 00000000 T ___isnanf
>>> 00000000 I __imp____isnanf
>>> 00000000 I __imp___isnan
>>> 00000000 T __isnan
>>> 00000000 I __imp___isnanf
>>> 00000000 T __isnanf
>>> 00000000 I __imp__isnan
>>> 00000000 T _isnan
>>> 00000000 I __imp__isnanf
>>> 00000000 T _isnanf
>>> $ nm libm.a | grep isnan
>>> 00000000 T ___isnand
>>> 00000000 I __imp____isnand
>>> 00000000 T ___isnanf
>>> 00000000 I __imp____isnanf
>>> 00000000 I __imp__isnan
>>> 00000000 T _isnan
>>> 00000000 I __imp__isnanf
>>> 00000000 T _isnanf
>>>
>>> I don't see what would be wrong here.
>>
>> It's not in libc.a, does that make a difference?
>
> It's in libm.a.
>
> cgf
That's orthogonal to the question I asked!
BTW, I keep getting this "Error: Version info is older than DLL API!"
message during my builds that I've never seen before. After some googling, it
turns out to be intended to warn that someone has added new exported APIs but
not updated the API_MINOR number. However I see the API_MINOR has been bumped
to 155, so I don't know why I'm seeing it. Is anyone else getting this?
Could it be significant?
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -