X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
From:	ericblake AT comcast DOT net (Eric Blake)
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	chroot bug?
Date:	Thu, 02 Mar 2006 04:56:32 +0000
Message-Id:	<030220060456.13296.44067B00000BC6DF000033F022070208530A050E040D0C079D0A@comcast.net>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

I noticed the following strange behavior in chroot:

$ chroot /bin /sleep 60 &
[1] 16220539
$ readlink /proc/${!}/root  # simple test of whether chroot worked
/bin
$ chroot //EBLAKE/share /cygwin/bin/sleep 60 &
[2] 566487
$ readlink /proc/${!}/root   # Good - chrooted to a share
//EBLAKE/share
$ chroot // //EBLAKE/share/cygwin/bin/sleep 60 &
[3] 529435
$ readlink /proc/${!}/root        # Oops - should be //, not /
/
$ chroot //EBLAKE/share/cygwin/bin/sleep 60 &  # Oops, failed to chroot
[4] 566487
$ chroot: cannot chdir to root directory: No such file or directory

Why is chroot failing to find //EBLAKE, when it worked with // (at
least, it slept correctly, although root linked to the wrong place),
and did just fine with //EBLAKE/share?

-- 
Eric Blake

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -