X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
From:	ericblake AT comcast DOT net (Eric Blake)
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: d_ino bug in //
Date:	Mon, 27 Feb 2006 17:58:50 +0000
Message-Id:	<022720061758.2378.44033DDA000153AC0000094A22073007930A050E040D0C079D0A@comcast.net>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

> >It looks like d_ino is not being correctly populated within //.
> >Running the program below on snapshot 20060220 produced:
> 
> A (somewhat) simple test case (patent pending) is nice but it really
> should be accompanied with an explanation of the problem.  How about
> describing *in words* what you think is broken?

It looks like Corinna already nailed the issue, but for the
archive's sake, my complaint was that under //, d_ino and
st_ino did not match properly.  With the 20060227 snapshot
(or whenever the next one is), the same test program
should now output:

Searching for //eblake, inode 10556217422951964268
match found at entry 553

-- 
Eric Blake

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -