X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<44033332.7020801@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 27 Feb 2006 12:13:22 -0500
From:	Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn AT redhat DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050929)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr AT integrable-solutions DOT net>
Cc:	Dave Korn <dave DOT korn AT artimi DOT com>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org,
	newlib AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject:	Re: gcc-3.4.4-1: c++: cmath: calling std::isnan results in endless loop
References:	<01d101c63bb9$ef9ead20$a501a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <m34q2kg2k3 DOT fsf AT uniton DOT integrable-solutions DOT net>
In-Reply-To:	<m34q2kg2k3.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> "Dave Korn" <dave DOT korn AT artimi DOT com> writes:
> 
> [...]
> 
> |   It looks to me like the cygwin/newlib combination is not being compliant if
> | it implements isnan as a function rather than a macro.  I couldn't see
> | anything in the standard that says it can be a function, and every reference
> | to it describes it as a macro, not a function.  It may be the case that
> | libstdc++ is within its rights to assume that isnan is a macro after all.
> 
> yes, isnan and friends are supposed to be macros only, not functions.
> 

I'll start working on a newlib patch for this.

> |   OTOH it may be that libstdc++ was only supposed to be shadowing those ctype
> | macros that are guaranteed to have underlying function implementations; I
> | don't know what the shadowing is for, so I can't comment.
> 
> libstdc++ is supposed to shadow ctype macros -- and it also expect
> them to have a function implementation.
> 
> -- Gaby


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -