X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Mime-Version:	1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2)
In-Reply-To:	<20060223112040.GD31794@calimero.vinschen.de>
References:	<00fc01c6371d$789be620$a501a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <897AB4F9-DECD-4714-8C45-5DA39C096F99 AT rehley DOT net> <20060223112040 DOT GD31794 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
Message-Id:	<4BFEBADC-51DD-40CD-9595-9337ABCBDD8E@rehley.net>
From:	Peter Rehley <peter AT rehley DOT net>
Subject:	Re: Hanging at GetModuleFileName in inside_kernel function
Date:	Thu, 23 Feb 2006 08:19:41 -0800
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Hi,
On Feb 23, 2006, at 3:20 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:

> On Feb 21 13:56, Peter Rehley wrote:
>> On Feb 21, 2006, at 11:31 AM, Dave Korn wrote:
>>
>>> On 21 February 2006 19:06, Peter Rehley wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Well, for my particular hang issue cygwin is hanging inside the
>>>> inside_kernel function on the GetModuleFileName call.  I tracked  
>>>> this
>>>> down by adding debug statements (strace.prntf) until I got to the
>>>> point where the debug print before GetModuleFileName would  
>>>> appear and
>>>> the ones after it didn't. This is consistent.  Each hang is  
>>>> happening
>>>> at this spot.
>>>>
>>>> However, this doesn't explain what is happening, but only where.
>>>>
>>>> I also observed that the times it hung were the only times
>>>> inside_kernel was actually called.
>>>>
>>>> I'm still trying to get more information.
>>>> Peter
>>>>
>>>> p.s. using cygwin snapshot 1.5.19-20060205.
>
> Due to your problem report and some googling, I had some vague idea
> yesterday, what the problem could be.  But it's not clear if the very
> simple patch I applied yesterday does really change anything with
> respect to your problem.
>
> Please test the 2006-02-22 snapshot from http://cygwin.com/snapshots/
> and report if you see a change, to the good or to the bad.
>
>
Yeah, I saw that change, and I tried yesterdays snapshot but it still  
hung.  I also did some more googling and found that someone submitted  
a patch a few years ago.  The patch checked to see if it was inside  
the ntdll.dll by looking at the handle.
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-patches/2003-q2/msg00004.html

I found this google too.
http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/archive/2004/01/28/63880.aspx

I'm going to try that patch today and see what happens.  Christopher  
didn't apply it because it was a bandage and didn't really fix the  
bigger problem.

Peter


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -