X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<43FA9336.3080905@cygwin.com>
Date:	Mon, 20 Feb 2006 23:12:38 -0500
From:	"Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8) Gecko/20051223 Fedora/1.5-0.2.fc4.remi Thunderbird/1.5 Mnenhy/0.7.3.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Curious about cygcheck -s' comment on vi
References:	<43FA8F88 DOT 4040607 AT serv DOT net>
In-Reply-To:	<43FA8F88.4040607@serv.net>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

L Anderson wrote:
> I ran "cygcheck -s" on my system and noticed the comment "Not found: 
> vi". A search of the web and Cygwin archives seems to indicate that vi 
> is not a Cygwin package and it doesn't show up in Setup.  Therefore, the 
> comment seems a bit like saying that oat meal is cholesterol free or 
> "Not found: elephants".  :-)
> 
> Just curious.
> 

Curiosity has been known to kill a cat or two. ;-)

<http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/package-grep.cgi?grep=%2Fbin%2Fvi>

-- 
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
838 Washington Street                   (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -