X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Mon, 20 Feb 2006 10:39:27 -0700 (MST)
From:	David Mastronarde <mast AT colorado DOT edu>
To:	Eric Blake <ebb9 AT byu DOT net>
cc:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: tar fails with some combinations of line ending and binmode setting
In-Reply-To:	<43F9F89E.4060605@byu.net>
Message-ID:	<Pine.LNX.4.60.0602201026140.12676@monalisa.hvem.colorado.edu>
References:	<Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 60 DOT 0602182254500 DOT 9627 AT monalisa DOT hvem DOT colorado DOT edu> <43F9F89E DOT 4060605 AT byu DOT net>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Mon, 20 Feb 2006, Eric Blake wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> According to David Mastronarde on 2/18/2006 10:55 PM:
>>
>> With CYGWIN set to binmode, tar fails on the archive of DOS files
>> created under nobinmode.
>>
>> With CYGWIN set to nobinmode, tar fails on the archives of DOS files
>> created under either mode.
>>
>> This happens on both a Windows 2000 machine with cygwin 1.5.19-4 and
>> a Windows XP machine with 1.5.18-1.
>>
>> In fact, the archive of DOS files created under nobinmode must be bad
>> since it fails to untar under Linux and OSX also.  All the other
>> archives are OK by this test.
>
> Well, nobinmode is documented as opening pipes in text mode
> (http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/using-cygwinenv.html), and tar uses a
> pipe to the compression program, so I'm not surprised (text mode has the
> nasty habit of corrupting binary data, and tar uses binary data).  I
> personally never use nobinmode (making pipes non-binary is just ASKING for
> problems, as you just proved), but I will see about trying to pinpoint yet
> one more location in tar where I should consider forcing binary mode.  But
> don't expect it to be my highest priority - you should be using binmode
> (or nothing at all, since $CYGWIN defaults to binmode).
>

Thanks for the explanation. It makes some sense once you realize a pipe is 
involved, but from a user standpoint it seems wrong for tar to try to do 
any conversions to the data.  I agree that nobinmode is problematic.  I 
considered using it because a bunch of my cshell scripts broke with the 
latest version of sed, which it started passing Ctrl-M's piped to it 
from program output.  Setting nobinmode was a potential workaround, 
but I decided it was better just to fix the scripts to filter the 
Ctrl-M's.

>>
>> tar                  1.15.1-2
>
> BTW, tar is at 1.15.1-3, consider upgrading (although it won't help for
> your particular testcase).
>
> - --
> Life is short - so eat dessert first!
>
> Eric Blake             ebb9 AT byu DOT net
> volunteer cygwin tar maintainer
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Cygwin)
> Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFD+fid84KuGfSFAYARApHWAJ4yAC0wIf/InE8sCLbc92nE4oIJXwCfQVcZ
> 4AqufY340uhBuK/QIeVHcFU=
> =jhnP
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -