X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<43F874F8.5060102@mycom-int.fr.invalid>
Date:	Sun, 19 Feb 2006 14:39:04 +0100
From:	Shaddy Baddah <sbaddah AT mycom-int DOT fr DOT invalid>
Reply-To:	The Cygwin Mailing List <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	The Cygwin Mailing List <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Updated: xemacs-21.5.23-1/xemacs-tags-21.5.23-1/xemacs-emacs-common-21.5.23-1
References:	<438C3A42 DOT 3000601 AT mycom-int DOT fr>
In-Reply-To:	<438C3A42.3000601@mycom-int.fr>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Hi,

On 11/29/2005 12:23 PM, Shaddy Baddah wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> A new *TEST* version of 'xemacs' has been uploaded to a server near you.
> 
> Thank you very much Volker. This version is exactly what I have been
> hoping for, for quite a while (Chinese characters in utf8 encodings, and
> msw toolkit).
> 
> Thanks also, of course, to the Cygwin & Xemacs developers and community.

The appreciation sentiment expressed above still holds. But I am curious 
how this package got the Good To Go?

I could find anything under cygwin-apps ml indicating it, and it seems 
to be missing the patch file that is required to compile "out of the box"?

Regards,
Shaddy


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -