delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
Message-ID: | <43F62223.A896948A@dessent.net> |
Date: | Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:21:07 -0800 |
From: | Brian Dessent <brian AT dessent DOT net> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: "have you looked into rebaseall?" |
References: | <016901c633f4$902f65e0$a501a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Reply-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Dave Korn wrote: > Absolutely so. I reckon doing a proper rebaseall that includes the oracle > dlls should make a noticeable difference. This is important. The rebaseall script only knows about DLLs installed via setup.exe. So, you will need to provide a list of any additional DLLs that you want rebased, with the -T argument. I haven't been following this thread all that closely, but are we talking about allocating a single large contiguous memory region? Because if you try to allocate it all at once then the DLL layout will matter, but if it's done as a series of smaller allocations then this should be irrelevant. Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |