| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: > On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 03:15:37AM -0800, Tim Prince wrote: > >>At 08:40 AM 2/10/2006, JefV wrote: >> >>>-- >>>View this message in context: >>>http://www.nabble.com/make%3A-rm%3A-command-not-found-t1100243.html#a2873151 >>>Sent from the Cygwin Users forum at Nabble.com. >>> >>> >>>-- >>>Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple >>>Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html >>>Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html >>>FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ >>> >>> >>> >>>SPAM: ---------------------- Spamnix Spam Report ---------------------- >>>SPAM: Spamnix identified this message as spam. >>>SPAM: Score: 52 >>>SPAM: Action: Quarantine >>>SPAM: ------------------- End of Spamnix Spam Report ------------------ >> >>How many of us do you expect to be viewing your message with spam >>filtering off? > > > Why should your spam filtering be of any concern to anyone posting to > the list? > > Perhaps if you were to figure out what contributed to that 52 score > and make a concrete suggestion, it would be helpful. > You don't think that the nabble URL and ad have any effect on spam filter triggering? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |