X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Wed, 1 Feb 2006 13:49:06 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: cygwin.bat improvements (was Re: Cygwin on XP disapearing terminal mystery)
Message-ID:	<20060201184906.GA7306@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<013120061516 DOT 12540 DOT 43DF7F67000B576B000030FC22058891160A050E040D0C079D0A AT comcast DOT net> <87mzhbkb9k DOT fsf AT newsguy DOT com> <43E02D37 DOT 6456298F AT dessent DOT net> <20060201035104 DOT GA12232 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <43E0360F DOT C2CF85F9 AT dessent DOT net> <20060201163737 DOT GE1648 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 63 DOT 0602011147430 DOT 9860 AT access1 DOT cims DOT nyu DOT edu> <20060201175628 DOT GI1648 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 63 DOT 0602011309500 DOT 9860 AT access1 DOT cims DOT nyu DOT edu>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.GSO.4.63.0602011309500.9860@access1.cims.nyu.edu>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.11
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 01:31:08PM -0500, Igor Peshansky wrote:
>On Wed, 1 Feb 2006, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 12:06:08PM -0500, Igor Peshansky wrote:
>> >However, most bash invocations should exit with a 0 exit code.  So, why
>> >not simply do something like the test below?
>> >
>> >if not errorlevel 1 goto nopause
>> >pause
>> >:nopause
>> >
>> >Also, "command not found" sets error code to 127, so the "1" above can be
>> >changed to "127".
>
>(actually Dave's right -- it's "9009").
>
>> Wouldn't that be:
>>
>>   if not errorlevel 0 pause
>
>Contrary to all common sense, "if not errorlevel A" means "if %ERRORLEVEL%
>< A", not an equality test...  So the above will *always* pause.  Also, in
>command.com (Win9x), I believe you can only have a "goto" after the "if
>errorlevel" test...

Ok.  I seem to vaguely recall this from MS-DOS days but I don't ever
recall that only goto is allowed.  I just tried this on Windows 98 and
it is possible to put something besides a 'goto' in the if clause.

Can anyone confirm/deny this on Windows 95?

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -