Mail Archives: cygwin/2006/01/30/07:36:42
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 10:01:44PM +0100, Peter Ekberg wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 12:13:12PM +0100, Peter Ekberg wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 10:58:00AM +0100, Peter Ekberg wrote:
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > I recently tried to build a package that was using cpp for other
> > > purposes than preprocessing C files. Its configure script was
> > > looking for a way to not have cpp predefine anything, and it
> > > specifically tried the -undef option, but failed. From reading the
> > > docs, I couldn't figure out why. Here's a quote from "info cpp":
> > >
> > > '-undef'
> > > Do not predefine any system-specific or GCC-specific macros. The
> > > standard predefined macros remain defined. *Note Standard
> > > Predefined Macros::.
> > >
> > > So I searched the web a bit and figured that I could probably fix
> > > it in the specs file. I realise that the specs file probably isn't
> > > the canonical place to change this, but I'll leave that to the gcc
> > > maintainer.
> > >
> > > Attached is a patch for the specs file that wraps all old define
> > > rules for cpp inside the following:
> > >
> > > %{!undef:old define rules}
> > >
> > > I don't know if this is the correct thing to do, but it works for
> > > me<TM>.
> >
> > GCC maintainer, are you there? Can you come out and play, please? :-)
>
> Ping.
Pong.
Cheers,
Peter
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -