delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2006/01/27/15:15:18

X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 15:14:59 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: LD_PRELOAD regression on 1.5.19-4 ? no more loaded library in child process
Message-ID: <20060127201459.GA8283@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <5CD8C8F9F151D142922161D4CF32F9400573F604 AT exch-lv03 DOT intl DOT businessobjects DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5CD8C8F9F151D142922161D4CF32F9400573F604@exch-lv03.intl.businessobjects.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 06:31:29PM +0100, Louis Lecaroz wrote:
>First, let met apologize if there were many misunderstanding between
>you & me.  I was really calm when I wrote my previous mail, there was
>no agression but maybe some missing smiley.

Your continued use of exclamation points would really suggest otherwise.  In fact,
you seem even more excited in this message.

>Next for your email address, I understand your concerned, I just copied
>& past it from the changelog & the source code where it was written &
>did not take care of this as these code & so your email address are
>publicly accessible from cvs :( but I understand that robots could use
>it for spamming.

http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR

>Looking a little bit better inside & drilling in the issue, here is
>what I found : from cmd.exe ->Start bash -->All environment variables
>from cmd.exe were propaged in bash environment+.profiles one.  -->Start
>"vi sample.txt" from this bash instance ---->A new instance of bash is
>loaded with also all environment variables.  ----->A VIM.exe instance
>is loaded but only with PATH, SYSTEMDRIVE, SYSTEMROOT, WINDIR !!!!!!!!!

Once again, you seem pretty excited.

I don't know why a vi session would start a new version of bash but I
couldn't duplicate this in any way.

Maybe reading http://cygwin.com/problems.html will be of some help.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019