X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
From:	"Dave Korn" <dave DOT korn AT artimi DOT com>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: i686-pc-cygwin on an i586
Date:	Fri, 27 Jan 2006 16:34:41 -0000
Message-ID:	<008401c6235f$9280aed0$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20060127153615.20800.qmail@web37214.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 27 January 2006 15:36, James McLaughlin wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Cygwin contains several files/folders with names including the string
> "i686-pc-cygwin". I'm using it on an i586, and I've been wondering if I'm
> supposed to be - should I have deduced from this name that there would be
> problems trying to use Cygwin on a 586? (I do have a few problems when
> using Cygwin, such as gcc-g++ being very slow to compile, but for all I
> know that could just be because I've got a very slow machine)    


  Nope, don't worry about it, that's a bit of a red-herring.  By default, the code gcc generates is good for everything from '486
up.  The instruction scheduling and choice of which instructions to use may be tuned to be optimal for a 686 and so may be
less-than-optimal on a '586, but there should not be any actual backward-compatibility issues.

    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -