Mail Archives: cygwin/2006/01/19/08:48:50
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jan 18 16:49, Linda A. Walsh wrote:
> > Oh, sorry Brian -- flash update. Have you upgraded in the past
> > 45 hours? Then you might have the newest feature implemented
> > by Christopher.
> >
> > Is there any logic to doing this for /proc and /cygdrive and not
> > /dev?
>
> The logic is that /dev should be a real directory, to allow stuff like
> creating the /dev/log unix domain socket when running syslogd, or for
> instance symlinks like /dev/tape -> /dev/st0 as expected by mt(1).
>
> If /dev is an emulated only directory, both of the above examples would
> fail.
FWIW, you can have /dev as a real directory populated by virtual devices.
Igor
--
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
|\ _,,,---,,_ pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu | igor AT watson DOT ibm DOT com
ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ Igor Peshansky, Ph.D. (name changed!)
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' old name: Igor Pechtchanski
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow!
"Las! je suis sot... -Mais non, tu ne l'es pas, puisque tu t'en rends compte."
"But no -- you are no fool; you call yourself a fool, there's proof enough in
that!" -- Rostand, "Cyrano de Bergerac"
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -