Mail Archives: cygwin/2006/01/15/10:57:48
pmcferrin wrote:
> Here is something a little OT....
>
> When making comparisons between multiple runs to run timing tests
> before and after a change, it there a way I can guarantee more
> consistent results? e.g. Condider the following:
>
> time find . -print | wc -l
>
> I can run the above sequence 3 times in a row and get huge
> differences due to OS caching and
> probably application caching (281 secs, 11 secs, 0.8 secs
> respectively).
I ran my tests (earlier in this thread) so many times that I got consistent
timings - this gave the figures I presented. All interference from other
software eliminated/minimized; the only way I can think of getting
consistent run times. Adding anythng at all gives uncertainty and varying
figures. Your measurements will most likely differ, even to a great extent -
dependeing on how much "junk" (i.e. SW) you have installed.
I consider this to be a "best possible" state for running the test; one
can't get any better (i.e. shorter) run times without removing selected
utilities and services - degrading the usability of the machine in the
process.
This clearly shows one known weak side of general operating systems - most
of the time there is so much different things going on that you can't count
on any predefined completion time for a given task.
This problem is addressed in RTOS'es and the like, and also is the subject
for research - e.g. some of the projects here
http://www.sics.se/cna/software.html I believe.
When it comes to practical cygwin use, this run time inconsistency shows
even more
- cygwin could be considered an OS (POSIX emulation) on top of another OS
(Win => ! Loose => Not Loose => Loose Nuts ;-).
> Is there any known way within MS XP Pro to flush
> all caching other than a reboot??
Maybe CacheSet from sysinternals.com ?
- http://www.sysinternals.com/Utilities/CacheSet.html
I have NOT tried it on XP, and thus can't recommend it in any way.
AFAIK it should mimic the functionality of the [vcache] section settings in
older windows WIN.INI file (or was it SYSTEM.INI?).
> I run
> into similar problems when validating multiple copies of a CD-R by
> calculating the checksum. The first checksum is valid but I can't
> trust the remainder due to OS caching.
You don't trust the OS to do cache handling correctly on CD-R's with
exactly the same contents, well what can I say - how would you distinguish
the difference between those CD-R's?
Somewhere long ago I've read that when running CMD.EXE - hitting CTRL-C at
the prompt should "re-read disk info" for 'CWD' IIRC (this was a long time
ago; in the age of 3.5" diskettes) ... I dunno if this still is true.
How about; Insert and briefly access a different CD in between, making the
OS/fs aware of disk changes?
> -Paul
<SNIP>
/H
--
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -