Mail Archives: cygwin/2006/01/14/15:39:06
On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 03:35:17PM -0500, Brett Serkez wrote:
>I'm still researching, I was going to respond this is posting at a
>later time with more insight, but before things get out-of-hand, I
>wanted to jump in. I suppose I'm still hopeful that we can zero in
>on what precisely is causing the on-demand scanners to consume so
>much CPU. Since Windows programs don't trigger the same level of
>response (or atleast they don't appear to) their must be some change
>that can be made.
I just wanted to make it clear that we aren't going to be making any
special concessions to a product like a virus scanner which cause perfectly
acceptable code to misbehave. If that is the case then it is a situation
for the virus scanner to work out. It's not a requirement that cygwin
work around things like this.
Maybe this is a given but I thought I'd just make it clear.
>I've started to notice that even on one system that I have that is
>relatively isolated, and not encumbered with security software, bash,
>ssh, sh and other programs seems to consume an inordinate amount of CPU.
Try setting CYGWIN=noinordinate .
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -