X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
X-T2-Posting-ID:	dCnToGxhL58ot4EWY8b+QGwMembwLoz1X2yB7MdtIiA=
X-Cloudmark-Score:	0.000000 []
Date:	Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:20:21 +0100
From:	Samuel Thibault <samuel DOT thibault AT ens-lyon DOT org>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Define _POSIX_SOURCE in cygwin's features.h?
Message-ID:	<20060112182021.GD5574@bouh.residence.ens-lyon.fr>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20060112173104 DOT GA30011 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <SERRANOzDskqC5EtrUV000000c2 AT SERRANO DOT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <20060112175908 DOT GB30108 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20060112180832 DOT GA4855 AT bouh DOT residence DOT ens-lyon DOT fr> <20060112181339 DOT GC30108 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20060112181339.GC30108@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.9i-nntp
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Christopher Faylor, le Thu 12 Jan 2006 13:13:39 -0500, a écrit :
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 07:08:32PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >But a portable program should _not_ assume that #defining _GNU_SOURCE
> >implies that _POSIX_SOURCE. If a program not only needs posix stuff but
> >also some GNU extras, it should #define _GNU_SOURCE _and_ _POSIX_SOURCE
> >itself.
> 
> I don't care about portable programs.

Then don't ask for your programs to get compiled under other systems
than GNU. Defining _GNU_SOURCE without defining _POSIX_SOURCE just means
you only target GNU systems. Cygwin is not a GNU system.

> I'm interested in hearing if this will fix problems with programs
> which build without problem on linux.

Maybe, but it's a really _wrong_ approach which cannot but just degrade
cygwin's POSIX compliancy.

Regards,
Samuel

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -