X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Wed, 4 Jan 2006 18:39:31 -0500 (EST)
From:	Igor Peshansky <pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: No takers? (was Re: ssh localhost date # "ls -lu" => remote command not being read)
In-Reply-To:	<20060104051608.GA24463@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Message-ID:	<Pine.GSO.4.63.0601041458460.11072@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
References:	<200512231711 DOT jBNHBvBl016124 AT tigris DOT pounder DOT sol DOT net> <200512241816 DOT jBOIGULc023975 AT tigris DOT pounder DOT sol DOT net> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 63 DOT 0512241947350 DOT 1926 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu> <200512261823 DOT jBQINIYK012941 AT tigris DOT pounder DOT sol DOT net> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 63 DOT 0512261557240 DOT 26685 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu> <200512262231 DOT jBQMVfiD014008 AT tigris DOT pounder DOT sol DOT net> <200512280538 DOT jBS5clef022489 AT tigris DOT pounder DOT sol DOT net> <20051230062711 DOT GA30157 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20060103225556 DOT GC15348 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <43BB49E5 DOT 5030101 AT cygwin DOT com> <20060104051608 DOT GA24463 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, Christopher Faylor wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 11:07:01PM -0500, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
> >My output seems similar to Igor's, though mine is longer :-( (and therefore
> >also bzipped) but definitely against the 12/29 snapshot.  Hope that helps.
>
> I just generated a new snapshot.  Does it behave any differently?  If not,
> another strace log would be appreciated.

This snapshot apparently fixes the "no output in non-interactive shells"
problem (with sshd started explicitly from a SYSTEM-owned shell), but the
sshd service does not start (see
<http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-01/msg00172.html>).

I was unable to interject strace into the service startup mechanism, but
the Event Log contains the following:

sshd: PID 5604: starting service `sshd' failed: fork: 0, No error.

Sshd starts up with no problems from a SYSTEM shell.
HTH,
	Igor
-- 
				http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
      |\      _,,,---,,_	    pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu | igor AT watson DOT ibm DOT com
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_		Igor Peshansky, Ph.D. (name changed!)
     |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'		old name: Igor Pechtchanski
    '---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL	a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

"Las! je suis sot... -Mais non, tu ne l'es pas, puisque tu t'en rends compte."
"But no -- you are no fool; you call yourself a fool, there's proof enough in
that!" -- Rostand, "Cyrano de Bergerac"


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -