X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<43BC2042.1000407@cygwin.com>
Date:	Wed, 04 Jan 2006 14:21:38 -0500
From:	"Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050929 Thunderbird/1.0.7 Fedora/1.0.7-1.1.fc4 Mnenhy/0.7.3.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: No takers? (was Re: ssh localhost date # "ls -lu" => remote command not being read)
References:	<200512231711 DOT jBNHBvBl016124 AT tigris DOT pounder DOT sol DOT net> <200512241816 DOT jBOIGULc023975 AT tigris DOT pounder DOT sol DOT net> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 63 DOT 0512241947350 DOT 1926 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu> <200512261823 DOT jBQINIYK012941 AT tigris DOT pounder DOT sol DOT net> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 63 DOT 0512261557240 DOT 26685 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu> <200512262231 DOT jBQMVfiD014008 AT tigris DOT pounder DOT sol DOT net> <200512280538 DOT jBS5clef022489 AT tigris DOT pounder DOT sol DOT net> <20051230062711 DOT GA30157 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20060103225556 DOT GC15348 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <43BB49E5 DOT 5030101 AT cygwin DOT com> <20060104051608 DOT GA24463 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
In-Reply-To:	<20060104051608.GA24463@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 11:07:01PM -0500, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
> 
>>My output seems similar to Igor's, though mine is longer :-( (and therefore
>>also bzipped) but definitely against the 12/29 snapshot.  Hope that helps.
> 
> 
> I just generated a new snapshot.  Does it behave any differently?  If not,
> another strace log would be appreciated.

Sorry Chris.  I signed off last night before you finished working. ;-)  The
Windows machine I test this on isn't accessible to me at the moment but I
will pull the new snapshot in and try it early in the evening tonight.  More
info to come...

-- 
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
838 Washington Street                   (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -