X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Wed, 4 Jan 2006 12:41:29 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: problem with running gdb in cygwin
Message-ID:	<20060104174128.GC11749@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<8256ea950601040903i6e81bf9cn3edd8f4af0dbb06e AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <SERRANOV0tpw4SvcDfS000001f6 AT SERRANO DOT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<SERRANOV0tpw4SvcDfS000001f6@SERRANO.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.11
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 05:22:15PM -0000, Dave Korn wrote:
>Krisakorn Rerkrai wrote:
>>I have a problem with running gdb in the cygwin.
>
>>Attached you find cygcheck.out
>
>Which confirms what cgf said.  Upgrade your cygwin dll.

And, AFAICT, the OP apparently didn't really read the referenced URL.
This seems to be a common occurrence.  People apparently think that they
are immune from all of the caveats mentioned at http://cygwin.com/problems.html
except for the "send cygcheck output".

Otherwise, apparently, it's ok to just ignore things like "using a
descriptive subject" or "don't start a new thread" or "include a test
case".


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -