delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2006/01/03/23:43:37

X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 23:43:31 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Does "^G" work on Windows 9x/Me?
Message-ID: <20060104044331.GA24111@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <010420060417 DOT 19001 DOT 43BB4C68000220B300004A3922007510900A050E040D0C079D0A AT comcast DOT net> <20060104043616 DOT GA23872 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20060104043616.GA23872@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 11:36:16PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 04:17:44AM +0000, Eric Blake wrote:
>>> Neither Corinna nor I have a real machine running Windows 98 any more
>>> so we can't easily test to see if echoing a CTRL-G to a console window
>>> running bash (or any other cygwin shell) actually does anything.  Can
>>> anyone confirm if this actually plays a beep?
>>
>>My experience with Win98 is that both before and after the patch,
>>snapshots 20051229 and 20060103 12:55:23, the command
>>"printf '\a%1000s\a' 1" produced two tweets on the motherboard
>>speaker (which is rather faint to hear since I keep my box underneath
>>the desk), rather than playing a .wav file on my speakers which
>>are located on my desk.  Yes, my 266MHz box is slow enough that
>>printing one thousand characters had enough noticeable I/O delay
>>that I could distinguish between the two beeps.  I would much
>>rather hear a .wav file, though (or not hear, as the case may be,
>>when I mute my desktop speakers - there is no way to mute the
>>motherboard speaker).
>
>The patch shouldn't have had an effect on a working installation so I'm
>glad that there is not change in the recent snapshot.
>
>Apparently, Windows 9x defaults to the system speaker no matter what.
>How very surprising that this would be inconsistent.  What. are. the. odds?
>
>>Maybe Win9x needs to use MessageBeep(0) to play a .wav.
>
>In theory, MessageBeep(-1) will try to play a sound, and if that fails,
>revert to the system speaker.  Other sounds are not documentated to work
>that way.  Otherwise, I probably would just change Cygwin to use 0 since
>this is supposed to play the default sound.  Or, we could even use our
>own nifty .wav file.

Sorry to follow up twice on my own message but, I should have read further
in the MessageBeep description.  It is documented as reverting to the
system speaker in all cases if the sound could not be played on a sound
card.

So, maybe I will just cause the system to use MessageBox(MB_OK) aka
MessageBox(0).

cgf


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019