| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
| From: | "Hannu E K Nevalainen" <_garbage_collector_ AT telia DOT com> |
| To: | <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
| Subject: | RE: executable = exe + data |
| Date: | Sun, 1 Jan 2006 19:29:33 +0100 |
| Message-ID: | <JAEBIEIILHAGMJNFODIEOENBCCAA._garbage_collector_@telia.com> |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| In-Reply-To: | <ur77rq1kz.fsf@gnu.org> |
| X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
| Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
| List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
| List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
| Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
| Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Sam S wrote:
>> * Brian Dessent <blip> [2005-12-31 15:46:50 -0800]:
>>
>> Sam Steingold wrote:
>>
>>> Is it possible?
>>>
>>> simply put, it it possible to write something like this:
>>>
>>> int main () {
>>> size_t my_length;
>>> <some magic>
>>> printf("exe size=%lld\n",my_length);
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>
>> All the methods mentioned so far are essentially hacks working
>> against the linker, doing stuff behind its back. Why not go with
>> the flow? Put your data in its own section, and write a linker
>> script to handle that section in the desired way. You can access
>> the address by referencing the linker script variables in your
>> source code. See section 3 of the ld manual, particularly 3.5.3.
>> This should work on any platform that uses ld.
>
> the problems with this is that the "data" that is being appended is
> not known at link time and appending it may not require C tools
> (ld/gcc &c).
Then your options seems to have shrunk to a "launcher" that basicly does
system("lisp.exe -M lispinit.mem")
Can you elaborate on _why_ the "single executable" is so important?
Having a monolithic application exe is hardly doable in most cases, AFAICS.
Unless you defer from using ANY external resources.
/H
--
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |