delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
From: | "Hannu E K Nevalainen" <_garbage_collector_ AT telia DOT com> |
To: | <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
Subject: | RE: executable = exe + data |
Date: | Sun, 1 Jan 2006 19:29:33 +0100 |
Message-ID: | <JAEBIEIILHAGMJNFODIEOENBCCAA._garbage_collector_@telia.com> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <ur77rq1kz.fsf@gnu.org> |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Sam S wrote: >> * Brian Dessent <blip> [2005-12-31 15:46:50 -0800]: >> >> Sam Steingold wrote: >> >>> Is it possible? >>> >>> simply put, it it possible to write something like this: >>> >>> int main () { >>> size_t my_length; >>> <some magic> >>> printf("exe size=%lld\n",my_length); >>> return 0; >>> } >> >> All the methods mentioned so far are essentially hacks working >> against the linker, doing stuff behind its back. Why not go with >> the flow? Put your data in its own section, and write a linker >> script to handle that section in the desired way. You can access >> the address by referencing the linker script variables in your >> source code. See section 3 of the ld manual, particularly 3.5.3. >> This should work on any platform that uses ld. > > the problems with this is that the "data" that is being appended is > not known at link time and appending it may not require C tools > (ld/gcc &c). Then your options seems to have shrunk to a "launcher" that basicly does system("lisp.exe -M lispinit.mem") Can you elaborate on _why_ the "single executable" is so important? Having a monolithic application exe is hardly doable in most cases, AFAICS. Unless you defer from using ANY external resources. /H -- -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |