X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
X-Matched-Lists:	[]
Message-ID:	<67310-22005124292356663@cantv.net>
Reply-To:	rodmedina AT cantv DOT net
From:	"Rodrigo Medina" <rodmedina AT cantv DOT net>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Why no-X11 ghostscript?
Date:	Wed, 28 Dec 2005 22:03:56 -0400
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Virus-Status:	Clean
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 2005/12/28 18:08:11,  Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:

>Rodrigo Medina wrote:
>> Hi,
>> If I am not mistaken, gs-X11 does everything that gs-no-X11 does, then
>> why distributing gs-no-X11 at all? A lot problems may arise due to the
>> presence of two different programs with the same name.
>> Of course all the programs of the package should go into /bin.
>> Bye
>> Happy holidays
>> R.M.

>Are you suggesting that gs-no-X11 requires X11?  If so, that's a bug.  If
>not, should we assume your question is rhetorical?

As the gs-no-X11 does something that gs-X11 does no do, that is it works
without
X11 DLLs, my question was not rhetorical, it was stupid. Nevertheless that
does not
solve the problem of the conflict between the two programs. I suggest doing
the following:

1- Having a unique ghostscript package,  with both gs-x.exe and gs.no-x.exe.
2- Install all executables, including both gs programs in /bin.
3- If X11 is installed then copy gs-x.exe to gs.exe, otherwise copy
gs.no-x.exe to gs.exe

Bye

Happy New Year

R.M.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -