X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
X-Matched-Lists:	[]
Message-ID:	<139020-22005123281993631@cantv.net>
Reply-To:	rodmedina AT cantv DOT net
From:	"Rodrigo Medina" <rodmedina AT cantv DOT net>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Why no-X11 ghostscript?
Date:	Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:09:36 -0400
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Virus-Status:	Clean
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Hi,
If I am not mistaken, gs-X11 does everything that gs-no-X11 does, then
why distributing gs-no-X11 at all? A lot problems may arise due to the
presence of two different programs with the same name.
Of course all the programs of the package should go into /bin.
Bye
Happy holidays
R.M.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -