X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<43ADBA1E.5030907@familiehaase.de>
Date:	Sat, 24 Dec 2005 22:14:06 +0100
From:	"Gerrit P. Haase" <gerrit AT familiehaase DOT de>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 Mnenhy/0.7.2.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: perl Bundle::Cygwin / perl-bundle-cygwin package
References:	<20051222174601 DOT GB3764 AT efn DOT org>
In-Reply-To:	<20051222174601.GB3764@efn.org>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:

> I'm working on creating a bundle of common Perl modules that build and
> pass all significant tests on cygwin.
> 
> I hope to have it accepted as a cygwin package.
> 
> Any particular module requests or comment on my proposed names
> for the CPAN bundle or cygwin package?

I'm willing to accept requests for inclusion if there are some really
important modules missing in the main perl distribution tarball, e.g.
XML::Parser is included because some of the Gnome packages needs it and
it is quite stable.

However, Yaakov and Reini have demonstrated that it is not impossible to
create seperate packages for single modules, so why not make each module
its own package?


Gerrit
-- 
=^..^=

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -