delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2005/12/21/12:17:33

X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 12:17:09 -0500 (EST)
From: Igor Pechtchanski <pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Please try a snapshot - final push for 1.5.19
In-Reply-To: <20051221162249.GA9890@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.63.0512211200200.8494@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
References: <20051221162249 DOT GA9890 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Wed, 21 Dec 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote:

> Only four more testing days remain if we want to get a cygwin 1.5.19
> release out there by Christmas.  Please try a snapshot and report
> success/failure to this thread.
>
> When reporting a problem please report the exact steps that you've taken
> and *please* narrow down the failure to the absolute minimum scenario
> needed to duplicate it.
>
> So, please try the 2005-Dec-21 snapshot: http://cygwin.com/snapshots/ .

I've been having problems with "fork: resource unavailable" on my machine
with the 10/03 snapshot.  The problem is only reproducible after Cygwin
has been running for a while, under a heavy load.  I'll try to see if it
appears under the 12/20 snapshot, but there's no guarantee I'll be able to
reproduce it in time for the release.  I know this isn't much of a bug
report, but this is just a heads-up.

I'm at a loss on how to proceed.  Would an strace captured under the 10/03
snapshot be helpful at all?  If not, would it at least be possible to add
the relevant debugging information to the fork() code, so that when I do
reproduce this (and I have a feeling that in a few days, I'll be able to),
I can get meaningful information from the strace even with the outdated
snapshot?  Unfortunately, the whole nature of the problem setting
precludes using the latest snapshot...  I also have a feeling that this
would be next to impossible to reproduce on other machines...

FWIW, here's the (IMO) relevant bit of the strace, captured under the
10/03 snapshot.  I don't know how normal it is for a newly-created process
to have the PID_EXITED bit set:

   22   76572 [main] bash 12000 fork: entering
   20   76592 [main] bash 12000 sig_send: sendsig 0x734, pid 12000, signal -40, its_me 1
   22   76614 [main] bash 12000 sig_send: wakeup 0x6E4
   27   76641 [main] bash 12000 sig_send: Waiting for pack.wakeup 0x6E4
   26   76667 [main] bash 12000 sig_send: returning 0x0 from sending signal -40
  255   76922 [main] bash 12000 stack_base: bottom 0x230000, top 0x22E72C, stack 0x22E72C, size 6356, reserve 6356
   21   76943 [main] bash 12000 frok::parent: CreateProcess (C:\cygwin\bin\bash.exe, C:\cygwin\bin\bash.exe, 0, 0, 1, 0x20, 0, 0, 0x22E730, 0x22E7A0)
 1180   78123 [sig] bash 12000 wait_sig: signalled 0x6E4

(the part below is repeated 20 times)
   37   89289 [main] bash 12000 open_shared: name (null), n 11608, shared 0x1470000 (wanted 0x0), h 0x6D4
   22   89311 [main] bash 12000 pinfo::init: looping because pid 11608, procinfo->pid 11608, procinfo->dwProcessid 6644 has PID_EXITED set
(the part above is repeated 20 times)

   38   89349 [main] bash 12000 frok::parent: pinfo failed
   28   89377 [main] bash 12000 frok::parent: returning -1
   18   89395 [main] bash 12000 fork: fork failed - child pid 11608, errno 11
   19   89414 [main] bash 12000 __set_errno: int fork():602 val 11
   19   89433 [main] bash 12000 fork: -1 = fork()

Any pointers/advice would be appreciated.
	Igor
-- 
				http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
      |\      _,,,---,,_		pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_		igor AT watson DOT ibm DOT com
     |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'		Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
    '---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL	a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

"Las! je suis sot... -Mais non, tu ne l'es pas, puisque tu t'en rends compte."
"But no -- you are no fool; you call yourself a fool, there's proof enough in
that!" -- Rostand, "Cyrano de Bergerac"

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019