X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_Berber?= <r DOT berber AT computer DOT org>
Subject:	Re: Where is patch?
Date:	Sun, 18 Dec 2005 16:35:14 -0600
Lines:	20
Message-ID:	<do4o71$76j$1@sea.gmane.org>
References:	<20051214200901 DOT GD29103 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <SERRANOiab2VL0fap6R000002ca AT SERRANO DOT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <dnq2fj$ct0$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <20051215085654 DOT GP2399 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)
In-Reply-To:	<20051215085654.GP2399@calimero.vinschen.de>
OpenPGP:	url=ldap://keyserver.pgp.com
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Corinna Vinschen wrote:
[snip]
> Err... huh?
[snip]

After re-building patch 2.5.9 the problem (in the test case) does not appea=
r.

Conclusion: the currently distributed patch 2.5.9 was compiled with perhaps=
 an
older Cygwin environment or at least one that made configure get a different
result to "checking whether system is Windows or MSDOS... (cached) no" resu=
lting
in a patch that works different when files have CR (the test patchfile was a
mixed CR-LF and LF line terminators).

--=20
Ren=E9 Berber


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -