delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2005/12/18/17:22:44

X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 23:22:33 +0100 (MET)
From: Angelo Graziosi <Angelo DOT Graziosi AT roma1 DOT infn DOT it>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Call for testing Cygwin snapshot (d_ino)
Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.4.21.0512182309350.5025-100000@ax0rm1.roma1.infn.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com


Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>>   Angelo Graziosi wrote:
>>
>>
>> I built ROOT-5.06.00, a CERN application, at Nov 10 2005 using
>> GCC-3.3.3-3 and the snapshot of that time.
>>
>> All worked fine.
>>
>> Now I have repeated the build using the same method, the same
>> GCC-3.3.3-3, but with the current snapshot 20051216 23:59:19.
>> 
>> The build fails:
>> 
>> -------------------------------------------
>> unix/src/TUnixSystem.cxx: In static member function `static const char* 
>>    TUnixSystem::UnixGetdirentry(void*)':
>> unix/src/TUnixSystem.cxx:3388: error: 'struct dirent' has no member
>> named 'd_ino'
>> make: *** [unix/src/TUnixSystem.o] Error 1
>> -------------------------------------------
>> 
>> The code that causes this error should be :
>> 
>> -------------------------------------------
>> #if defined(_POSIX_SOURCE)
>> // Posix does not require that the d_ino field be present, and some
>> // systems do not provide it.
>> #   define REAL_DIR_ENTRY(dp) 1
>> #else
>> #   define REAL_DIR_ENTRY(dp) (dp->d_ino != 0)
>> #endif
>> -------------------------------------------
>> 
>> ...
>> 
>> Is there a workaround ?
>
> .....
>
> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2005-12/msg00205.html
>
> cgf

If I have well understood, I should change


   #   define REAL_DIR_ENTRY(dp) (dp->d_ino != 0)


with 

   #   define REAL_DIR_ENTRY(dp) (dp->__deprecated_d_ino != 0)


Is this correct?



Best regards,

   Angelo.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019