X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<43A1ACF2.80600@student.lu.se>
Date:	Thu, 15 Dec 2005 18:50:42 +0100
From:	Lennart Borgman <lennart DOT borgman DOT 073 AT student DOT lu DOT se>
User-Agent:	Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Where is patch?
References:	<SERRANOoHMwVN7miR9O0000003d AT SERRANO DOT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <43A1A66B DOT 9080704 AT student DOT lu DOT se> <43A1A895 DOT A6231F0E AT dessent DOT net>
In-Reply-To:	<43A1A895.A6231F0E@dessent.net>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Brian Dessent wrote:

>Lennart Borgman wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Thanks! There is a hit, I did not have "as" from Cygwin. Changed my path
>>a bit. But how do I find "as"? I would get the package search as it is
>>now is of no big use for such a name? ;-)
>>    
>>
>
>Sigh.  'as' is part of binutils.  It contains the assembler and linker
>and you will not be able to do a thing with regards to compiling
>anything until you have it.
>  
>
Thanks Brian.

>But more importantly, binutils is listed in the 'requires' line of
>'gcc-core' which means it should have been selected when you chose gcc. 
>So whatever you did to install gcc, you somehow managed to seriously do
>wrong.
>  
>
I am not sure I understand what you mean. What is the "requires" line? 
Where is it? Should binutils have been dowloaded automatically when I 
downloaded gcc-core?

When I look under Devel in setup.exe the binaries for binutils are 
checked but without any download date. "which as"  says "as" is not 
found. Can you tell me what I should have done? Did I do something wrong 
or is there perhaps a bug? Could it perhaps be because the downloader 
stalled? (Maybe because of slow download here.)

When I now clicked next, without checking any new pages the downloading 
did continue. I believed I started setup.exe and clicked continue 
before, but as far as I remember right now I dod not open Devel that time.

I think I can guess how this works now, but I am not quite sure and it 
is a bit confusing IMO.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -