delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Christopher Faylor wrote: > I think there is very small chance of that. IIRC, some of that code is > straight out of the cygwin DLL itself. > > I think that anyone who had studied the cygwin path handling code would > have a tough time proving that there was no "taintedness" if they tried > to produce a library under a different license. Crud. Well I suppose from a code reuse standpoint it would still make sense to factor out that stuff so that setup and cygcheck (and anything else GPL) can share it. But without a relicensed version it still means that 3PPs that want to gracefully distribute Cygwin stuff have to write all the mount table stuff themselves (or run /bin/mount, which I guess is the mantra anyway.) Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |