X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Wed, 7 Dec 2005 13:15:50 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Hang with 20051205 snapshot while building OOo
Message-ID:	<20051207181550.GA22138@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<43970AD1 DOT 8070704 AT scytek DOT de>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<43970AD1.8070704@scytek.de>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.11
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 05:16:17PM +0100, Volker Quetschke wrote:
>We got some new features in the hangs with the 20051205 snapshot
>when building OOo.
>
>This trace looks a little bit different from the old versions,
>see thread around <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/2005-10/msg00600.html>,
>but it still hangs.

It looks different because I took out all of the debugging strace
output that I added to try to track this down.

I'm convinced that the hang is coming from timeGetTime.  That's a
Windows routine and there's not much I can do if a windows routine
decides to take a long time to return.

So, in other words, I'm admitting defeat in this case, especially since
this isn't a regression from 1.5.18.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -