Mail Archives: cygwin/2005/12/06/14:45:47
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 08:36:07PM +0100, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
>Svend Sorensen schrieb:
>>On 12/4/05, nidhog <nidhog AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
>>
>>>On 12/4/05, Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 12:20:57PM +0100, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>I have a little open-source project, which eases Windows administration
>>>>>a bit.
>>>>>
>>>>>In some of the scripts, I use usernames and passwords (to get to a
>>>>>password-protected network share etc.).
>>>>>Because they are scripts, username and password is in plain.
>>>>>
>>>>>Although the script files are only readable by SYSTEM and
>>>>>Administrators, if a disk is stolen, someone could easily get the
>>>>>passwords by doing simple "grep -r password ./*".
>>>>>
>>>>>Do you know some tool which could "encode" scripts?
>>>
>>>instead of storing them plaintext, why don't you try encoding them via
>>>cryptographic hashes - md5, sha1, tiger and the like.
>>
>>
>>How is the script going to get the plaintext password if all it has is
>>a one way hash?
>
>I don't really care, perhaps it won't be any one way hash anyway.
>
>It is to be a measure to prevent an accidental viewing of
>usernames/passwords rather than some "military grade" tool which takes
>100 years to break on a supercomputer.
So, in that case, someone has already made a suggestion:
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2005-12/msg00181.html
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -