X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4395E827.4070804@wpkg.org>
Date:	Tue, 06 Dec 2005 20:36:07 +0100
From:	Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo AT wpkg DOT org>
User-Agent:	Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-3mdk (X11/20051015)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Svend Sorensen <ssorensen AT gmail DOT com>
Cc:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: encoding scripts (so that user can't see passwords easily)?
References:	<4392D119 DOT 7080409 AT wpkg DOT org> <20051204173646 DOT GA28855 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <deca9ec80512042242h44317cexf2878291acddcc8a AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <7ff9c2a10512060949l72e9693bv251e0d46c36ea0e0 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<7ff9c2a10512060949l72e9693bv251e0d46c36ea0e0@mail.gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Svend Sorensen schrieb:
> On 12/4/05, nidhog <nidhog AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
> 
>>On 12/4/05, Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 12:20:57PM +0100, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
>>>
>>>>I have a little open-source project, which eases Windows administration
>>>>a bit.
>>>>
>>>>In some of the scripts, I use usernames and passwords (to get to a
>>>>password-protected network share etc.).
>>>>Because they are scripts, username and password is in plain.
>>>>
>>>>Although the script files are only readable by SYSTEM and
>>>>Administrators, if a disk is stolen, someone could easily get the
>>>>passwords by doing simple "grep -r password ./*".
>>>>
>>>>Do you know some tool which could "encode" scripts?
>>
>>instead of storing them plaintext, why don't you try encoding them via
>>cryptographic hashes - md5, sha1, tiger and the like.
> 
> 
> How is the script going to get the plaintext password if all it has is
> a one way hash?

I don't really care, perhaps it won't be any one way hash anyway.

It is to be a measure to prevent an accidental viewing of 
usernames/passwords rather than some "military grade" tool which takes 
100 years to break on a supercomputer.


-- 
Tomek
http://wpkg.org
WPKG - software deployment and upgrades with Samba

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -