Mail Archives: cygwin/2005/12/04/14:46:06
On Dec 4 11:41, Peter Rehley wrote:
> >On Dec 2 12:34, Peter Rehley wrote:
> >>On Dec 2, 2005, at 3:14 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >>>The problem is, that your Samba version apparently screws up the
> >>>inode
> >>>information and we have re-enabled using the inode numbers sent from
> >>>remote file systems which are supposed to be capable of that. For
> >>>this
> >>>we use the HAS_PERSISTENT_ACLS property.
> >>>[...]
> >>I'm using mac os x 10.4.3 which is using samba version 3.0.10. So
> >>it's not that old. However, I did find one reference that implied
> >>that mac did something funny for acl's.
> >>
> >>I'm going to try install a non-apple version of samba and see what
> >>happens.
> >[...]
> Can I say "D'oh"? I knew I could ;)
>
> The problem turned out to be a samba configuration issue. Several
> months ago I had added the parameter "large readwrite = no" to my
> smb.conf file in order to speed up transfers between my mac and
> windows. When it's in the configuration file the inodes are messed
> up. When I remove it, the inodes are fine.
>
> I get the same behavior on a non-apple version of samba... in my case
> I tried the darwinports version, 3.0.20b, and large readwrite had the
> same problem.
>
> So problem solved.
Cool. Thanks for keeping us informed so this is in the archives now.
Maybe that's even worth to note in the FAQ.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -