delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2005/12/02/15:35:05

X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2)
In-Reply-To: <20051202111414.GO2999@calimero.vinschen.de>
References: <20051130171137 DOT GE2999 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <57A85FA1-5088-4CB9-8998-9853FC0DDBB1 AT rehley DOT net> <20051201213806 DOT GM2999 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <9ED848C7-59B5-4009-BB85-5BCA9F5E3F53 AT rehley DOT net> <20051202111414 DOT GO2999 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
Message-Id: <F645AE91-6E30-4137-A3A2-7DA78502C660@rehley.net>
From: Peter Rehley <peter AT rehley DOT net>
Subject: Re: Call for testing Cygwin snapshot (problem with inode numbers)
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 12:34:53 -0800
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Dec 2, 2005, at 3:14 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:

> On Dec  1 15:38, Peter Rehley wrote:
>> On Dec 1, 2005, at 1:38 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>
>>> On Dec  1 13:01, Peter Rehley wrote:
>>>>  It only appears to be a problem
>>>> when I have a mac os x share mounted to a drive on windows.     
>>>> When I
>>>> try with a windows share or a linux share I don't seem to have the
>>>> problem.
>>>>
>>>> The problem that I'm seeing is that the inode value isn't unique  
>>>> when
>>>> listing a directory (or using any program that uses the inode  
>>>> value).
>>>
>>> Do I understand you right that this only happens for  
>>> directories?  The
>>> normal file inodes are looking ok?
>> No, it also happens for files too.
>
> $%^&
>
>>> The output of both tests might be helpful.
>> Output is attached.
>
> Well, the volume information looks exactly as usual for a remote Samba
> drive.
>
> The problem is, that your Samba version apparently screws up the inode
> information and we have re-enabled using the inode numbers sent from
> remote file systems which are supposed to be capable of that.  For  
> this
> we use the HAS_PERSISTENT_ACLS property.
>
> What Samba version is your Mac OS X using?  I'm using 3.0.20a for  
> which
> the inode information is useable.  Is Samba a part of the OS  
> packages or
> did you install it from an external source?  Is it a rather old one?
> Can you upgrade?  The problem is that there's no way for us to  
> distinguish
> between a newer and an older version of Samba.  I would rather not  
> lose
> the inode information when available.
>
I'm using mac os x 10.4.3 which is using samba version 3.0.10.  So  
it's not that old.  However, I did find one reference that implied  
that mac did something funny for acl's.

I'm going to try install a non-apple version of samba and see what  
happens.
>
> Corinna
>
> -- 
> Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding  
> Cygwin to
> Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
> Red Hat, Inc.
>
> --
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
>
>


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019