delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2005/12/02/06:14:22

X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 12:14:14 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Call for testing Cygwin snapshot (problem with inode numbers)
Message-ID: <20051202111414.GO2999@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20051130171137 DOT GE2999 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <57A85FA1-5088-4CB9-8998-9853FC0DDBB1 AT rehley DOT net> <20051201213806 DOT GM2999 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <9ED848C7-59B5-4009-BB85-5BCA9F5E3F53 AT rehley DOT net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9ED848C7-59B5-4009-BB85-5BCA9F5E3F53@rehley.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Dec  1 15:38, Peter Rehley wrote:
> On Dec 1, 2005, at 1:38 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> 
> >On Dec  1 13:01, Peter Rehley wrote:
> >>  It only appears to be a problem
> >>when I have a mac os x share mounted to a drive on windows.    When I
> >>try with a windows share or a linux share I don't seem to have the
> >>problem.
> >>
> >>The problem that I'm seeing is that the inode value isn't unique when
> >>listing a directory (or using any program that uses the inode value).
> >
> >Do I understand you right that this only happens for directories?  The
> >normal file inodes are looking ok?
> No, it also happens for files too.

$%^&

> >The output of both tests might be helpful.
> Output is attached.

Well, the volume information looks exactly as usual for a remote Samba
drive.

The problem is, that your Samba version apparently screws up the inode
information and we have re-enabled using the inode numbers sent from
remote file systems which are supposed to be capable of that.  For this
we use the HAS_PERSISTENT_ACLS property.

What Samba version is your Mac OS X using?  I'm using 3.0.20a for which
the inode information is useable.  Is Samba a part of the OS packages or
did you install it from an external source?  Is it a rather old one?
Can you upgrade?  The problem is that there's no way for us to distinguish
between a newer and an older version of Samba.  I would rather not lose
the inode information when available.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019