X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<438F8090.A4C156D3@dessent.net>
Date:	Thu, 01 Dec 2005 15:00:32 -0800
From:	Brian Dessent <brian AT dessent DOT net>
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: How to improve scp speed?
References:	<61f6f4390511281238o1e512ef8i14647828fcf32c AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <BAY105-F2693514CAA56EEF86ECAC3E9480 AT phx DOT gbl> <dmii0m$s50$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <438D6EE0 DOT 1000406 AT gmx DOT de> <dml03k$6gq$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <438E30CB DOT 4327D914 AT dessent DOT net> <dmnn4i$ogg$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Cary Jamison wrote:

> Ok, I probably am.  But, you wouldn't expect the buffer tuning to make such
> a big difference, either, since a fast processor can surely move data around
> in memory several times faster than it can move it over the net.  All these
> things add up, though....

The window size has nothing to do with the local CPU and everything to
do with the bandwidth * latency product of the link.

Brian

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -