X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
From:	"Dave Korn" <dave DOT korn AT artimi DOT com>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: complete newbie Q
Date:	Tue, 29 Nov 2005 16:43:17 -0000
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<438C6EE7.1090606@myrealbox.com>
Message-ID:	<SERRANObKyksp5gT5na0000021b@SERRANO.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

-Tim Prince wrote:
> Weiqi Gao wrote:
>> On 11/29/05, rosty <dima.hristov> wrote:

>> 
>>> For example, can a take a unix source,
>>> compile and run it under cygwin, then go to another win32 machine that
>>> has not cygwin installed, and run it there?
>> 
>> 
>> No.
>> 
> Unless you can accept -mno-cygwin as a solution.  

  Actually, the answer's _still_ no.

  If you use -mno-cygwin, you won't have the cygwin library functions
available, and most bog-standard unix sources won't compile without some
porting effort.  (MinGW provides _some_ of the POSIX syscalls, but it's a
massively less-complete implementation than Cygwin.  MSYS provides more, ).


    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -