X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Christopher McIntosh <christophermcintosh AT mchsi DOT com>
Subject:	sshd via XP Service vs. sshd init daemon
Date:	Thu, 24 Nov 2005 21:18:58 -0600
Lines:	21
Message-ID:	<dm5vr5$q86$1@sea.gmane.org>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Cyg-winners:

I have a question that the FAQs do not seem to address.

It is possible to install sshd as an init daemon (via usr/sbin/chkconfig 
--add) *and* it is also possible to install sshd as a full-fledged XP 
service (via /usr/bin/ssh-host-config).

QUERY:  What are the pros and cons of each method?

IMO, I prefer to have less full-fledged services; then it is simpler to 
start several daemons (e.g., xinetd, sshd, ftpd, ...) via a single 'net 
start init' or 'cygrunsrv --start init' reducing the number of tasks to 
perform for a change in state.

Am I overlooking potential advantages for running as an independent, 
full-fledged service?

Thanks to all who share the enlightenment!  :)

Christopher


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -