Mail Archives: cygwin/2005/11/24/11:48:17
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 05:41:39PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>Corinna Vinschen, le Thu 24 Nov 2005 16:41:38 +0100, a ?crit :
>>On Nov 24 12:39, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>>>Corinna Vinschen, le Thu 24 Nov 2005 12:25:03 +0100, a ?crit :
>>>>You're missing the infrastructure necessary to send file descriptor
>>>>data between processes.
>>>
>>>This is not trivial indeed, but it is _possible_, isn't it?
>>
>>Well, sure, everything is possible one way or the other.
>
>Not when it requires modifying the windows kernel because of security
>guards. Here, transfering a windows socket handle _is_ possible with
>the current kernel. Work only resides in cygwin. That's the expected
>answer to the original question, I guess.
Yeah, if only the infrastructure necessary to send file descriptor data
between processes wasn't trivial. If it was, we could even use plain
old DuplicateHandle.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -