| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
| Message-ID: | <4a162fd0511231156h142d7a7fnb598aee09b134ec4@mail.gmail.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 23 Nov 2005 11:56:55 -0800 |
| From: | Jeff Hardy <linuxrlz AT gmail DOT com> |
| To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| Subject: | WSADuplicateSocket used to implement ssh session multiplexing? |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
| List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
| List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
| Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
| Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id jANJv4wc028929 |
I understand that windows does not allow sending open file descriptors over sockets and that is the reason that session multiplexing through a control master doesn't work. The documentation for WSADuplicateSocket states that the resulting WSAPROTOCOL_INFO structure can be sent through an IPC to a target process and that the target process can then call WSASocket with that info and the effect is a shared socket. If the sending process closes the socket, then the target has the connection to itself. Is this essentially the same as sending an open file descriptor through a socket? I am of course assuming that the fd that is being sent is for a socket. Or am I really missing the big picture? -jeff hardy -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |