X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Tony Richardson <ar63 AT evansville DOT edu>
Subject:	Re: Complex.h file
Date:	Sat, 19 Nov 2005 18:55:33 +0000 (UTC)
Lines:	26
Message-ID:	<loom.20051119T194631-42@post.gmane.org>
References:	<20051119113646 DOT e162e782 DOT john AT jcoppens DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

John Coppens <john <at> jcoppens.com> writes:

> I'm tying to port a program of mine to cygwin, and have the following
> problem:
> 
> complex.h is not found.
> 
> The compiler complains about the missing complex.h and about the complex
> type in a file, even though I read gcc has complex C-99 support built-in
> since 3.4.1

Well gcc 3.4.4 has built-in support for complex types, i.e. the following works
(without including complex.h)

   _Complex double x = 7 + 8i;
   x += -3 - 4i;
   x *= 2 + 5i;
   x /= 3 - 4i;
   printf("(%f,%f)\n", creal(x), cimag(x));

but it does not have built-in support for all of the complex functions
that are declared in complex.h.  I would assume the "problem" is
more of newlib issue than a gcc one.

Tony Richardson



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -