Mail Archives: cygwin/2005/11/01/07:40:57
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
> Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>
>> Gerrit P. Haase dixit:
>>
>>
>>> Yes. Fritz Box Fon.
>>>
>>>
>>>> These block 445/tcp/ipv4 totally, non-disablable and undocumentedly,
>>>> just to "protect" some Windows® systems.
>>>
>>>
>>> I cannot believe it. Are there other ports blocked which I should be
>>> aware of?
>>
>>
>>
>> I have no idea. We just found this out by accident - I was at a
>> friend's place and wanted to install him jupp (a joe-editor fork,
>> another piece of code by me)...
>>
>> What about a written inquiry to AVM?
>
>
> It is incredible annoying to be patronized like a child, at least it
> should be possible to disable the blocking. However, I have not much
> interest to start a discussion with AVM, and I have the option to use
> another line with another router which doesn't block any port.
>
> I found all Netbios ports but 445 configured in the main configuration
> file of the box, I could disable the blocking of 135 and 137-139 but
> not 445.
>
>
> Sigh!
> Gerrit
Well, while I've not come across confirmed cases of routers blocking
ports, ISP's do. I know of several offhand, based in the UK.
It's all as a result of blaster, which was a result of bad coding from
m$.. So no surprises there.
Chris
--
Spinning complacently in the darkness, covered and blinded by a blanket
of little lives, false security has lulled the madness of this world
into a slumber. Wake up! An eye is upon you, staring straight down and
keenly through, seeing all that you are and everything that you will
never be. Yes, an eye is upon you, an eye ready to blink. So face
forward, with arms wide open and mind reeling. Your future has
arrived... Are you ready to go?
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -