Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Mon, 17 Oct 2005 11:04:41 +0200
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: mlockall() and cygwin
Message-ID:	<20051017090441.GB11091@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20051013123327 DOT GH2908 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20051016134754 DOT 4556 DOT qmail AT web25603 DOT mail DOT ukl DOT yahoo DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20051016134754.4556.qmail@web25603.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.2i

On Oct 16 15:47, Mohamed Amjed Ben Salah wrote:
> Hello,
> Is there any similar function in cygwin to avoid
> pagging and provide real time ? I have cygwin on Win
> XP.

Sorry, no.  If the application is only going to work on NT anyway,
have a look into the MSDN and see the man pages for VirtualLock and
SetProcessWorkingSetSize.

Otherwise, mlock and munlock still have to be implemented in Cygwin
(http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#SHTDI), mlockall/munlockall probably
never will.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -