Mail Archives: cygwin/2005/10/11/11:01:39
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 05:51:00PM +0300, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
>On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>
>> > >It might be a different problem but the message is the same.
>> >
>> > It *is* a different problem.
>>
>> Ok.
>>
>> > Some thread is sending a signal 31 (SIGUSR1). Which thread is doing this?
>>
>> An application thread signaling another thread to stop its execution. I am
>> on it - I'll report back if I manage to find something.
>
>While tracking this problem I found what I suspect is a small bug in
>the way sigsuspend() works when it is used to retrieve the list of pending
>signals for a thread other than the main one. I think this is related to
>the crash I am seeing in some way though this has to be determined yet.
See the FIXME a few lines down from that.
>As I read the code, when retrieving the list of pending signals
>sigpending() inspects only the list of blocked signals for the main
>thread - it doesn't look in the thread specific list of blocked signals
>of the calling thread.
So, it sounds like you're pretty close to a PTC.
I don't see how ignoring blocked signals would cause a SEGV however.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -