Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<434B95C0.8030200@sh.cvut.cz>
Date:	Tue, 11 Oct 2005 12:36:48 +0200
From:	=?UTF-8?B?VsOhY2xhdiBIYWlzbWFu?= <V DOT Haisman AT sh DOT cvut DOT cz>
User-Agent:	Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: boost, boost_unit_test_framework
References:	<434AE423 DOT 6070701 AT brasse DOT org>
In-Reply-To:	<434AE423.6070701@brasse.org>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

--------------enig167DB95F4A2439C0C610919C
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



Mattias Br=C3=A4ndstr=C3=B6m wrote:
> Hello!
>=20
> I want to write some C++ programs that use boost and compile them using
> cygwin. What is the recomended way of doing this?
>=20
> Usually when I use the boost libraries (on Fedora Core) I would be able
> to link my program using gcc by providing -lboost_date_time on the
> command line. With cygwin I can't do that since there is no
> libboost_date_time.a library insalled. However, these libraries are
> installed:
>=20
> /usr/lib/libboost_date_time-gcc-mt-s-1_33.a*
> /usr/lib/libboost_date_time-gcc-mt-s.a*
This is called 'versioned' layout.

>=20
> In my build scripts I would still like to be able to specify
> -lboost_date_time and not -lboost_date_time-gcc-mt-s. Is it the
> intention of the maintainer of the cygwin boost package that I should
> make a symbolic link (ln -s libboost_date_time.a
> libboost_date_time-gcc-mt-s.a) to the library that I want to use?
You can either add the links or you can have something like
BOOST_SUFFIX=3D-gcc-mt-s and use -lboost_date_time${BOOST_SUFFIX}.

>=20
> In my opinion it would be preferable to have one of the  different
> variants of the date library installed as libboost_date_time.a. Is there
> any special reason why it's done like it is today?
Marking the version in the way it is now done is prefered by those who
approve this package.

>=20
> Another question regarding the cygwin boost package is why the test
> libraries are missing?
Because its build is broken on Cygwin.

>=20
> I am curious. =3D)
>=20
> Regards,
> Mattias

Vaclav Haisman




--------------enig167DB95F4A2439C0C610919C
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iQEVAwUBQ0uVwG56zbtzMDG0AQITbQgAmJBFkYp6tLJAyQTe4ixDeDGNwc+x996U
Ynprcd7AT8NLMgQEiSMZYwU6n/WdgwjFWWJRbZmtbDy6Hmx3WPAIvghwbH7cQpmQ
qtV4E3qRwH+4chDRhE3iOfd+xvw6Q9cjm5+a6M3ftznH9x7t78vtHLEffEY9No8u
uiblYn/+Mdpv18vTVjpUUQGV6DPOtLjIISQuSeJv++dT35Icq9MjjfiSF+2om04p
3S27J0ybodkJAHRFWIKcLPYh7z3wGzAOC8SFRIAIrnHNtbXzqMEefGUIAVZAdMGT
JPT9Gzwih9IEUq1RwRYRfkw7g6BQNDGZltD0zWsToua0QtCn474SYQ==
=AmRF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig167DB95F4A2439C0C610919C--

- Raw text -